The US midterm elections just concluded, and with the “blue tsunami” I would like to know opinions of people in AI.
What will the impact be? I’m not politically active, so I’m curious to know what folks think the future looks like.
Open source? Data centers? Space based compute?
> Data centers?
Most of the datacenter stuff will continue to at the state and local level, zoning and permitting etc. Federal effects will likely be limited. For example any change in EPA rules affecting whether the companies can get special exemptions for not-so-temporary gas turbine power-plants. Of course, that needs either legislation or someone in the EPA willing to change regulations who won't get fired by Trump.
> Open source?
I doubt there'll be much movement there, because the day-to-day stuff is tied to control of the Executive branch, many tech-improvement things already fell victim to White House Republicans' orgy of destruction in 2025. [0] I doubt they'll reverse direction soon.
> Space based compute?
No change to the engineering, so still a boondoggle fantasy no matter who controls congress.
[0] https://www.npr.org/2025/03/04/nx-s1-5317569/a-federal-effic...
Are there any serious bills about consumer protection and data privacy at the federal level? I haven't seen any come up, but maybe they were in the background until after this election. Neither party has had a good track record on privacy so I'll be interested to see if any large scale privacy bill is suggested or if it will be more niche oriented for specific topics.
For that example government-tech-improvement group, here's a copy of their policy from when it was still active before Trump took office [0]:
> This is a copy of the 18F open source policy. The official document lives in GitHub. If you would like to comment or suggest a change to the policy, please do so there.
> [...]
> The default position of 18F when developing new projects is to:
> 1. Use Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), which is software that does not charge users a purchase or licensing fee for modifying or redistributing the source code, in our projects and contribute back to the open source community.
> 2. Develop our work in the open.
> 3. Publish publicly all source code created or modified by 18F, whether developed in-house by government staff or through contracts negotiated by 18F.
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20241127174937/https://18f.gsa.g...
Both: The policy is void because the group is gone and the work isn't happening because most of the people to do it were fired.
__________
In case you (or someone else) truly just missed the news: When Trump took office he illegally [0] appointed his biggest donor Elon Musk to bring in private randos [1], with the brag that they could easily cut $2,000 billion in "waste". They then set about ideologically dismantling and firing a bunch of the government agencies [2] and terminating contracts based on "woke" keywords [3] before it imploded [4] and failed to achieve even a fraction of its promised actual cost-cutting. [5]
[0] https://www.reuters.com/legal/judges-consider-barring-musks-...
[1] https://projects.propublica.org/elon-musk-doge-tracker/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_federal_agencies_targeted_b...
[3] https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-doge-grant-terminations-u...
[4] https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/04/doge-july-4-white-h...
[5] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg0rg9wmvlo
https://www.gsa.gov/directives-library/gsa-open-source-softw...